November 18, 2006 in Iraq War

Refreshing Honesty From Blair

Post placeholder image

It is good to see that Prime Minister Blair is starting to be honest about the situation in Iraq. Maybe now that he and President Bush are publicly owning up the reality of the situation over there, something will be done to bring this war to an end.
I am not advocating that the US and British military pull out anytime soon, but they need to redefine the mission based on the current state of affairs. Plus they need to do what is necessary to help the Iraq government be more stable and thus accountable for running their own country again. If that unfortunately means allocating more money and sending more troops in the short run, I’m all for that. But maintaining the status quo, is simply not ideal. Things just seem to be going from bad to worse.

Blair admits Iraq is ‘pretty much a disaster’
By Philip Webster, Political Editor of The Times

Tony Blair went close last night to admitting that the invasion of Iraq had been disastrous. Challenged in an interview on Al-Jazeera’s new English-language channel that the Western intervention in Iraq had “so far been pretty much of a disaster”, he gave a brief agreement before swiftly moving on.
He said: “It has, but you see what I say to people is why is it difficult in Iraq? It is not difficult because of some accident in planning, it is difficult because there is a deliberate strategy, al-Qaeda with Sunni insurgents on one hand, Iranian-backed elements with Shia militias on the other, to create a situation in which the will of the majority for peace is displaced by the will of the minority for war.”

Mr Blair’s frank remarks came on the day that one of his most loyal ministers was reported to have described the war as “his big mistake in foreign affairs”. Margaret Hodge was said to have accused Mr Blair of espousing “moral imperialism”, remarks that she denied through an aide but which were recalled by people who attended the private meeting at which she was alleged to have made them.
Mr Blair was speaking to Sir David Frost on the first edition of his Frost Over the World programme on Al-Jazeera International, which was launched on Wednesday. His appearance is a boost for the network, which was once denounced as propaganda by Donald Rumsfeld, the former US Defence Secretary, and is perhaps best known in Britain for broadcasting tapes from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda.
After his apparent admission that the intervention had been a disaster, he insisted: “We are not walking away from Iraq. We will stay for as long as the Government needs us to stay.
“And the reason for that is that what is happening in Iraq, as in Afghanistan, as elsewhere in parts of the Middle East, is a struggle between the decent majority of people, who want to live in peace together, and those who have an extreme and perverted and warped view of Islam, who want to create war. In those circumstances, our task has got to be to stand up for the moderates and the democrats against the extremists and the sectarians. They are testing our will at the moment, and our will has not to be found wanting.”
Mr Blair also rejected as absurd suggestions that his readiness to work with Iran and Syria in the search for Middle East peace amounted to appeasement. He repeated his appeal to the two countries described by President Bush as part of an “axis of evil” to become partners for peace.
He said that he had a message for Tehran and Damascus: “If you are prepared to be part of the solution, there is a partnership available to you. But at the moment, and this is particularly so in respect of what Iran is doing in supporting terrorism throughout the Middle East and acting in breach of its nuclear weapons obligations, you are behaving in such a way that makes such a partnership impossible.”
Mrs Hodge, a Trade and Industry Minister, also allegedly told a branch meeting of the Fabian Society that she had doubted Mr Blair’s approach to foreign affairs since 1998. According to the Islington Tribune newspaper, she singled out Mr Blair’s “moral imperialism” — exporting British attitudes and ideas to other countries — for criticism. She had accepted the Prime Minister’s argument about the dangers posed by Iraq before the March 2003 invasion because “he was our leader and I trusted him”.
She is said to have told the meeting later: “I hope this isn’t being reported.”
The Islington Tribune said that Eric Gordon, its editor, sat in on the meeting of Islington Fabian Society, which was held last Friday at the London Resource Centre in Holloway Road. Mark Blunden, a reporter for the paper, said that Mr Gordon had taken a shorthand note of the alleged remarks and that the story had been checked thoroughly.
There were no questions over her future particuarly after Mr Blair’s remarks. Downing Street sources said that Mrs Hodge had denied using the remarks attributed to her and they appeared ready to accept that, despite the view of others who were there. Sacking Mrs Hodge would have drawn greater attention to her remarks, ministers said.


  1. November 19, 2006 at 8:35 pm


    What a coward. Really, I do wish politicians would start being more honest with the public about their true feelings. Maybe then we’d have some respect for the institution.

  2. November 19, 2006 at 12:48 am


    It is a great shame that the whole of the Number 10 press office is now saying he didnt mean what he said.
    “Downing Street insisted it was not Mr Blair’s view that the violence in Iraq had been a disaster.
    A spokeswoman said: “He was simply acknowledging the question in a polite way before going on to explain his view.
    “To portray it as some kind of admission is completely disingenuous.”

Comments are closed.

By browsing this website, you agree to our privacy policy.
I Agree