Did Anyone Else Think The Half Time Show Was Lame?
I channel hopped for most of Super Bowl XXXIX. However, I watch the half time show and let me say that I was not impressed. Paul McCartney gave a decent performance, but the show overall was pretty lame….heck, I almost fell asleep. Thus, shame on the NFL for reaching back and choosing such a safe performer from almost another lifetime. When you have a billion+ people watching your show, thinking they could have easily booked a more hip entertaining performer that wouldn’t repeat last years wardrobe malfunction.
Comments are closed.
February 9, 2005 at 9:22 am
Perhaps over the years, I’ve just come to expect the SuperBowl half-time performance to be a hip show with lots of big name acts. More importantly, I’ve grown to expect that these acts would be a bit more current with the times. So while Paul McCartney is a big name, he’s somewhat dated to me at least. Heck, the songs he played were over 30 years old.
February 8, 2005 at 9:08 am
Paul McCartney is classic, and his music never goes out of style. I thought his performance was freakin’ awesome!
February 7, 2005 at 10:02 pm
I have to respectfully disagree…..I am as sarcastic and jaded as the day is long, but I actually dug the halftime show. Sure it was safe and sterile, but give me a simple performance like that over Nelly grabbing his crotch anyday.
February 7, 2005 at 3:18 pm
No way! Paul McCartney fucking rocks! WHOOOO-HOOOOOOOO!!!!!