March 2007 Archives

House Hunting: Week One

 

I am feeling a bit stressed. Not surprising since there are things to be discussed with Airport Guy. More importantly, I am feeling really nervous about finding a flat for purchase. I started viewing places last night and I was underwhelmed. They were small and in a less than desirable neighborhood. Now realizing that my budget is somewhat limited, I am willing to compromise but being a single female, only to a degree. So the next few weeks and months should be quite interesting.

So what exactly am I looking for? Well, below is my brief to the agents:

Area: Flexible but need to be relatively "safe" and flat should be close to public transportation and other amenities
Commuting Distance to Office: No more than an hour door to door
Type: Victorian or Georgian but will consider new builds
Bedrooms: At least 2 (ideally both double)
Inside space: Above 700 square feet, preferable with open plan kitchen and living room
Outside space: Not required but if property has garden that would be a nice bonus
Features: hardwood floors, fireplace, built in wardrobes/closets

So is that asking too much? Well apparently it is in London if you have less than a quarter million pound buying power. Goodness! It's times like these I really wish I had a husband. Going through this alone is really going to test my strength of character.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Internet Reputation

 

Further confirmation that what we say on our personal blogs can affect our future career prospects.

Careless online talk can cost candidates jobs
By Andrew Taylor, Employment Correspondent
Published: March 28 2007 03:00 | Last updated: March 28 2007 03:00

Be careful what you write about yourself on personal blogs or on websites such as MySpace - it could cost you the job you always wanted.

Potential employers, searching the web for personal information about job applicants, are likely to take a dim view of accounts of drunken nights at Spearmint Rhino or character assassinations of former managers, says a new study.

One-fifth of managers had sought "personal information about job candidates on the web" according to the survey of more than 600 employers by Viadeo, which operates an online information exchange and forum for businesses.

One-quarter of employers who had used the web to search for personal details had "actually rejected applicants, based on dubious personal information".

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Endings

 

I had a realization about myself the other day. I am not very good at ending romantic relationships. In fact, I have never ended a romantic relationship. Sure I've chosen not to go on second dates, but once a proper relationship begins, I've never ended things. It's always been the other person. Or in the case with Racquetball Guy, neither of us said the relationship was over, we just let it fizzle out. Overall, thinking that wasn't a good thing as my self esteem greatly suffered towards the end. Thus moving forward, I'm going to have to be more assertive in this area. Enough with the internal dialogue. Needs have to be met and if they've been communicated and are still not being met, then its best to just move on.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Changes and More Changes

 

With my 2 year anniversary in London fast approaching, about a month ago I decided to kick things up a bit. Specifically, I've been spending more time out after work and on the weekends being social. I also decided to try and exercise more and not drink alcohol. Now I'm not a big alcohol drinker to begin with (I've only been throw up drunk once in my life), but in that drinking in a big part of the English culture, I've finding it a bit hard. Mainly because people just don't go out for 1 drink, they have several. And watching everyone else get drunk while you remain sober gets old after a while.

In other news, I have to move in a few weeks. Despite the fact that I've paid my rent on time to my landlord each month, he has failed to pay the mortgage and so the property is being repossessed. I'm most annoyed by this as I didn't rent from a doggy estate agent. I rented from Foxtons one of the largest estate agents in London. In fairness to Foxtons, they have been quite sympathetic but in that they just manage and do not own the property, there is nothing they can do. So I'm pissed off about the whole situation.

Moving beyond my anger, I am trying to think about my next move. Do I continue to rent? Or do I try and get on the London property ladder? After this experience I'm leaning towards buying but somewhat worried that I won't be able to afford a 2 bedroom flat in my desired neighbourhood. So visiting a mortage broker on Monday to get the process rolling. And since I have to move from my current place by 17th April, I'll also be looking for a 6 month rental situation. Thinking that will give me enough time to traipse around London with various estate agents in search of that elusive dream home flat.

With that in mind, everyone out there who owes me money (you know who you are), needs to repay the debt. London is one of the most expensive housing markets in the world and being a single gal, I am going to need every penny to make this dream a reality.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Sorry

 

I picked up my iPod today for the first time in months. Now Madonna's Sorry is on serious replay. Mainly because it touched a cord. But while the song focuses on not wanting to hear sorry, can't help but reflect on the fact that there are people (family members and friends) out there who need to say sorry to me for some of their recent actions. However not holding breath that this will happen anytime in the near future. Oh well! Live and learn.

Sorry by Madonna

Je suis désolé
Lo siento
Ik ben droevig
Sono spiacente
Perdóname

I've heard it all before
I've heard it all before
I've heard it all before
I've heard it all before
(repeat)

I don't wanna hear, I don't wanna know
Please don't say you're sorry
I've heard it all before
And I can take care of myself
I don't wanna hear, I don't wanna know
Please don't say 'forgive me'
I've heard it all before
And I can't take it anymore

You're not half the man you think you are
Save your words because you've gone too far
I've listened to your lies and all your stories (Listen to your stories)
You're not half the man you'd like to be

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

McDonalds is launching a campaign to get British dictionary publishers to change the definition of McJob. Personally, I think they are wasting their time. While the current definition is somewhat insulting to the company and those who work there, they should pursue other endeavors as it's a battle that cannot be won. Meaning, while you can try and persuade people not to use the term, you really can’t get people to change the definition. Particularly as the definition is a reflection of the times. Thus this campaign is futile. So instead of bringing publicity to the word, they should just focus on promoting the fact "eighty per cent of McDonald’s UK branch managers joined the company as hourly paid “crew members”, as did half the company’s executive team." With those sort of statistics, they offer a lot more than the typical fast food employer.

New definition would be just the job for McDonald's
By Stefan Stern and Jenny Wiggins
Financial Times, Published: March 20 2007 02:00 | Last updated: March 20 2007 02:00

McDonald's, home to the McMuffin and the McNugget, is fed up with being home to the McJob.

The UK arm of the fast food chain is starting a campaign to get British dictionary publishers to revise their definitions of the word "McJob", a term the Oxford English Dictionary describes as "an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector".

The word first emerged in the US in the 1980s to describe low-skilled jobs in the fast food industry but was popularised by the Canadian writer Douglas Coupland, in his 1991 novel Generation X. It appeared in the online version of the OED in March 2001. McDonald's plans a "high-profile public petition" this year to get it changed.

"We believe that it is out of date, out of touch with reality and most importantly it is insulting to those talented, committed, hard-working people who serve the public every day," wrote David Fairhurst, chief people officer in northern Europe for McDonald's, in a letter seen by the Financial Times seeking support for the petition. "It's time the dictionary definition of "McJob" changed to reflect a job that is stimulating, rewarding and offers genuine opportunities for career progression and skills that last a lifetime."

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Accent Snobbery

 

After almost 2 years in London, I am no longer seduced by the English accent. Oh sure, I still think its sexy when someone like Colin Flirth speaks, but when your average blue blood or toff opens their mouth, I don't automatically assume that what they say will be of any importance or intelligence. Truth be told, most of them are just full of hot air.

Fry claims accent is on success for UK actors
TIM CORNWELL, ARTS CORRESPONDENT
The Scotman, Tue 20 Mar 2007

BRITISH actors get an easy ride in Hollywood because their accents make Americans think they are talented, Stephen Fry, the actor and writer, suggested yesterday.

Fry spoke out after seeing a "blitz of Brits" take prizes at the Golden Globe awards, but admitted he was committing "high treason".

Helen Mirren, Bill Nighy, Emily Blunt and Hugh Laurie led the British names at the awards, even though Laurie - Fry's former comedy partner - won for playing an American in the medical drama House. However, Fry also singled out Jeremy Irons and Judi Dench, who have both been showered with Golden Globes and Oscars throughout their careers.

In this week's Radio Times, Fry writes: "I shouldn't be saying this, high treason really, but I sometimes wonder if Americans aren't fooled by our accent into detecting a brilliance that may not really be there.

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Relationships

 


Thought of the Day:

Money or the lack thereof, changes everything! Sometimes for the good but most often for the worst.

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

2012 Olympic Games

 

I think Paris is thanking their lucky stars they didn't win the 2012 olympic bid. £9 billion is a hell of a lot of money to spent on a sporting event.

London Times, March 15 2007

The bill for the 2012 Olympics could exceed £9 billion, the Government admitted today, three times what it originally estimated.

In a much-delayed announcement because of disagreements in Whitehall over which departments will foot the rising costs, the Culture Secretary and Olympics Minister, Tessa Jowell, told the House of Commons that the complete cost of preparing London for the games could reach £9.3 billion.

To contend with the increasing costs, the National Lottery, which is already providing £1.5 billion towards the event, will be raided for a further £675 million. Central Government provision will rise to £6 billion.

The budget includes £3.1 billion for the building of the Olympic park and relevant infrastructure in Stratford, East London — up £800 million from the Government's early estimates — £1.7 billion in regeneration costs and a £2.7 billion contingency fund, which will be made available if costs increase further.

| 3 Comments | No TrackBacks

London is a State of Mind

 

With my two year anniversary approaching, I can safely say that I am not yet tired of London. Too bad its so darn expensive!

London Times, March 15 2007

Tired of London? Then you’re tired of life: discuss

Our correspondent provoked a global debate with his claim that London is the capital of the world. Here he stands by his view, and leading expat London residents give theirs

James Harding

It was a perfect spring morning yesterday and, after being bashed about the ears for meekly suggesting that London is the greatest city on earth and gingerly calling for a unilateral declaration of London’s independence from the UK, I got up early and went for a jog in the park. (One of the wonderful things about London is that there are countless parks. Sorry, fans of Tokyo.)

When I got to the top of Primrose Hill, I was reminded of a story told to me by a respected historian. At a bleak moment during the Second World War, when the city was under heavy bombardment and the mood in the country was heavy with doom, Winston Churchill took a walk up Primrose Hill. He returned to the Commons and declared what he had found: “I looked out over London,” he said, “and I found it was still there.” The House erupted in cheers.

Well, for all the grumblers who responded to my love letter to London by saying that Zurich is better, Cambodia is sunnier, Shanghai is growing faster, New York is cheaper and London is a dirty, hoodlum-ridden “hell hole”, here is the bad news: it is still there. In fact, judging by the building cranes that poke up across the skyline, it is only going to get bigger, brasher and more obnoxious.

And, I guess, that is the point: the response made me realise that London is not only a fact of life, but it is a state of mind.

The people who love London seem to love the same things about it: the sense of possibility, the openness to the world, a culture and an economy that looks in all directions — backwards, inwards, outwards and to the future.

The piece also hit a nerve with provincial grumblers, people who do not like the city. They dislike London because they dislike city life: for them it is too busy, too noisy, too dirty. They are tired of it.

And as we all know, when a man is tired of London he is tired of life, for, as the great Dr Johnson concluded, there is in London all that life can afford.

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

London Calling

 

Not to be a traitor or anything, but I agree with James Harding -- London feels like the capital of the world.

London Times, March 13, 2007

London calling

It’s cool, classy, cosmopolitan — and it should secede from the UK. Business Editor James Harding on why London is the new capital of the world. Do you think he is right?

A couple of years ago, a friend of mine bought a one bedroom flat in Chalcot Square in Primrose Hill, London NW1. He paid £480,000 — just less than one million dollars. As I was living in the States at the time and flabbergasted by the price, he explained: “Chalcot Square is the best place in Primrose Hill, which is the nicest part of London, which is the coolest city on earth.” Location, location, location. “This is the best property on the planet.”

In fact, he was a few miles off. The most prized piece of real estate on God’s green earth has a view of the Serpentine rather than of Joan Bakewell’s living room. The Candy brothers, two upmarket property developers, have started selling flats at Number One Hyde Park for £4,200 a square foot. That means £84 million — $164 million — for a nice, roomy apartment.

Why? Because London is, indeed, the coolest city on earth. The capital of the world. New York, like Paris, has become a mini-break destination, a playground for grown-ups who enjoy the same standard tourist menu: a walk around Central Park; a shopping trip in SoHo; an entertaining, if unsurprising, show on Broadway; and a very large steak.

The world loves a long weekend in New York but, these days, prefers to make its home in London. New York has the nostalgia, London the future. New York defines the metropolitan, London the cosmopolitan.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Apparently black men being on the down low is just a myth. Heck, I think not! I lost a friend last year because I found out that he was sleeping with men as well as his girlfriend without her knowledge. He was definitely on the down low because niether his family or friends knew he was bisexual. Granted he was under no obligation to tell me, but his girlfriend, that was a whole other matter. So even if its just 1 of 1000 black men out there leading a double life, it's still one too many and definitely proof that this phenomenon is not a myth.

A Low-Down Crying Shame
Why the myth of the "on the Down Low" brother refuses to die.
By Ta-Nehisi Coates
Slate Magazine
Posted Friday, March 9, 2007, at 7:32 AM ET

Even in the far-fetched world of daytime drama, the soap Passions is known for its dalliances with the surreal. The show has featured witches, ghosts, mermaids, and, most shockingly, a strong cast of Latino and black actors. As Passions enters its final season, you'd expect black fans to be up in arms at the impending demise of daytime's rainbow coalition. But more than the show's death, what's raising the hackles of Passions' black viewership is the recent revelation that one of its leading men, Chad Harris, is on the Down Low.

Meet the cultural phenomenon that makes epidemiologists groan and writers grin. "On the Down Low" is the term for a black man who is in a committed relationship with a woman and nevertheless sleeps with men. In 2004, as HIV rates for black women spiked to appallingly high levels, the Down Low became the media's culprit of choice for African-American AIDS rates. The hype spread thanks to a slew of ill-conceived newspaper and magazine stories (like this one), and J.L. King's tell-all memoir, On the Down Low, which sold 140,000 copies and got King on Oprah, where he exposed his membership in this bacchanal sect.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Low-Carb Diets

 

Maybe the Atkins Diet isn't so bad after all.

Atkins dieters triumph in study By Rebecca Knight

Published: March 9 2007 02:00 | Last updated: March 9 2007 02:00

For weight-watchers trying to decide where to turn next, new research offers some help: the largest ever comparison of four popular diets tips the scale in favour of the low- carbohydrate eating plan known as the Atkins diet.

The study's results, in the new issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, show that Atkins dieters lost more weight than those on other diets, and also experienced more benefits in terms of cholesterol and blood pressure.

In the study, conducted by researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine, 311 overweight women were randomly assigned to follow either the Atkins, Zone, Learn or Ornish diet. The Atkins diet - fashionable among Hollywood celebrities - represents the lowest-carbohydrate diet. The Zone diet focuses on a 40:30:30 ratio of carbs to protein to fat, a balance said to minimise fat storage and hunger. The Learn diet, based on nutritional guidelines, is low in fat and high in carbs. The Ornish diet is very high in carbs and extremely low in fat.

At the end of a year, the women on Atkins had lost an average of 10.4lb. Those on Learn lost on average 5.7lb, the Ornish followers lost 4.8lb and women on the Zone diet lost 3.5lb.

Women following Atkins, relative to at least one of the other groups, also had larger decreases in body mass index and blood pressure. In addition, their good cholesterol increased more than that of women on the other diets.

http://jama.ama-assn.org/

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

International Women's Day

 

Am I the only one who was clueless yesterday about International Women's Day? It's been going on since 1900 and this is the first year I've been really aware of this global celebration of women.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

In Praise of Pre-Nups

 

Someone recently told me that "nothing last forever." They didn't say this in the context of relationships or marriages, but considering that divorce rates continue to increase, the jaded side of me can't help but think he might have had a point with regards to this oldest of institutions. Thus I am really surprised that the British courts still do not recognize pre-nuptial agreements.

Start with the end in mind when it comes to marriage
By Tim Harford
Published: March 5 2007 02:00 | Last updated: March 5 2007 02:00

For most of us, the most important contract we will ever enter into is marriage. It is a shame that nobody really seems to know what the contract says, and for obvious reasons it is considered poor form to ask.

These issues will be richly illustrated this week when the latest big-money divorce case reaches the Court of Appeal. The multi-millionaire insurance underwriter John Charman is arguing that his ex-wife Beverley, to whom he was married for 30 years, should receive £20m rather than the £48m he has been ordered to pay her.

With children grown and provided-for, £20m is more than Mrs Charman needs but £48m is substantially less than half of the assets built up during the marriage. In this sometimes-yawning gulf between an equal division and what the poorer spouse needs lies the zone of uncertainty in which divorce lawyers are gambolling, while politicians avoid the subject.

The judges are trying to make sense of it all as they go along. That is a shame. Their decisions do not simply affect the unhappy couple in front of them, but the incentives of others. It is often said that if divorce is a blank cheque for the poorer spouse, the rich will fear marriage with the less wealthy altogether. But it is also true that if divorcees expect no extra money as a result of their partner's entrepreneurial efforts they will offer lacklustre support. Mr Charman has complained that his wife hesitated to let him use their home as collateral for a big business loan. Perhaps she realised that she might not enjoy all the rewards if the gamble paid off.

Every divorce is different. Should the length of the marriage matter? Or the extent to which the wealth was accumulated before the marriage began? Or who filed for the divorce?

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Top Five Things to Remember

 

1. No man is an Island.

2. You have to make yourself happy before you can do that for others.

3. Actions speak louder than words. Don't ignore the signs!

4. Be true to yourself. Mean what you say. Do what you say!

5. Stay true to your core values.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

An Admission

 

I am starved for attention and affection but not necessarily from the opposite sex. At this stage, moreso from family and friends. To make that happen, I suppose I need to try harder. Let people know that I really care about them. Perhaps then, they'll start to care more about me.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

My Accent

 

It has been awhile since I posted the results from one of these silly quizzes.

What American accent do you have?
Your Result: The Northeast
 

Judging by how you talk you are probably from north Jersey, New York City, Connecticut or Rhode Island. Chances are, if you are from New York City (and not those other places) people would probably be able to tell if they actually heard you speak.

The Inland North
 
Philadelphia
 
The South
 
The Midland
 
Boston
 
North Central
 
The West
 
What American accent do you have?
Quiz Created on GoToQuiz
| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

Indian Food

 

Almost two years in London and I'm still not a big fan of Indian food. I have tried the food at both dive and posh places and yet, it's not at the top of my list when it comes to ethnic cuisine. Personally, I prefer Chinese food anyday over Indian, but I think I'm in the minority here in London. Indian restaurants are all over the place but finding a good Chinese restaurant outside of Chinatown is quite difficult.

Where Indian Cuisine Reaches for the Stars
New York Times, By HENRY SHUKMAN, Published: March 4, 2007

DID the Indian restaurant, with its flock wallpaper and piped sitars and tablas, its biryanis and vindaloos, save British cuisine? It was in the '60s that Indian restaurants began to proliferate, and four decades later, in 2001, Robin Cook, the foreign minister, hailed chicken tikka masala as a true national dish of Britain. Previously, there was only fancy French food out of the reach of most, and the bland boiled nursery yuck that generations of Britons had had little choice but to swill, and tell themselves they liked.

Haute Curry India gave Britain chutney, mustard, pepper, curry and mulligatawny soup. It gave Britain flavor. It even gave us Jamie Oliver's trademark “pukka.”

I remember discovering biryanis as a teenager. They were an incredible value. Your rice and meat came mixed together, with a vegetable curry on the side — two meals in one, in effect. And so good. So profoundly did those meals enter my psyche that even today I only have to hear sitar music and it brings on a Pavlovian salivation, with olfactory hallucinations of cumin.

Britain is now as cuisine-obsessed as anywhere. Chefs are big stars. Food has become a facet of fashionable style in England. So where does this leave the traditional Indian restaurant, with its menu of rich, variously colored curries that come in mild, medium and hot, usually with a film of oil swimming on top, and its clientele that swells after 11 p.m. when the pubs close?

Whatever beneficent effect Indian cuisine had on the British palate has doubled back. There's a new generation of high-end Indian restaurants that argue with plausibility that their cooking is just as sophisticated as any others, and why shouldn't they too receive Michelin stars, as four in London have, including three of the five below.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Not Really An Orphan

 

I need to let go of some of the hurt from my past so I reached out to my dad earlier today. It was the first time I had spoken to him in over 20 years. We did communication through my mother back in 1992 when I was graduating from Michigan but when he decided not to come after making a big hoopla about being there, I gave up on him and all contact went through my older sister.

In any event, the conversation, was really weird. Mainly because he sounded really old and a fraction of his former arrogant self. I suppose that's not too surprising since he's been sick for some time.

There will be an opportunity to meet up in the near future, but I'm conflicted about seeing him. Perhaps because while I want to reconnect, I don't want to ruin the image I have of him in his younger years. Plus seeing him might make me think more of his eventual death at which point I'll really be an orphan. So for now, I'm just happy talking to him over the phone.

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

I am a little late in linking this article, but this situaton at DePauw University Delta Zeta Chapter is a perfect example of why I had no interest in joining a sorority at Michigan.

Sorority Evictions Raise Issue of Looks and Bias
New York Times, By SAM DILLON, Published: February 25, 2007

GREENCASTLE, Ind. — When a psychology professor at DePauw University here surveyed students, they described one sorority as a group of “daddy’s little princesses” and another as “offbeat hippies.” The sisters of Delta Zeta were seen as “socially awkward.”

Worried that a negative stereotype of the sorority was contributing to a decline in membership that had left its Greek-columned house here half empty, Delta Zeta’s national officers interviewed 35 DePauw members in November, quizzing them about their dedication to recruitment. They judged 23 of the women insufficiently committed and later told them to vacate the sorority house.

The 23 members included every woman who was overweight. They also included the only Korean and Vietnamese members. The dozen students allowed to stay were slender and popular with fraternity men — conventionally pretty women the sorority hoped could attract new recruits. Six of the 12 were so infuriated they quit.

“Virtually everyone who didn’t fit a certain sorority member archetype was told to leave,” said Kate Holloway, a senior who withdrew from the chapter during its reorganization.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

What Women Want

 

I think I need to email this article to Airport Guy with a few more dos and don'ts added.

London Sunday Times
March 04 2007
What she really really wants

Should you call her all the time or play it cool? Flirt with her friends or her mother? When it comes to keeping your woman happy, the rules change as she gets older. Shane Watson gives a decade-by-decade guide.


Fashion magazines have developed a habit of pigeonholing women by decade (what to wear in your twenties, the clothes that work in your thirties, blah blah blah). It’s maddening. But when it comes to handling the women in their lives, a decade-by-decade guide could be just what men have been looking for. Maybe the reason that the question “What do women really want?” has never been satisfactorily answered is because what they look for in their twenties is very different from what they want in their thirties and what they need in their forties. Just when men think they’ve got the hang of it (don’t be too available), age kicks in and the goalposts are moved (be very available and contactable at all times).

So, for the benefit of all the confused men out there — and the women still waiting to be understood — here’s our guide.

IN HER TWENTIES

DO

- Be a bad boy — up to a point (NB That point is sleeping with her girlfriends). All twentysomethings love a rascal; it’s only later in life that the self-preservation gene starts to kick in.

- Tidy your bedroom before inviting her round. No matter how laid-back her vibe, she won’t be impressed if your flat looks like something off the set of Skins — check under the bed for takeaways.

- Make an effort to understand what she’s trying to tell you. When she says, “I’d just like to do something quiet next Wednesday,” she is probably thinking about that romantic little French place round the corner, not an evening watching Chelsea on the flat-screen telly at that pub nobody ever goes to.

- Remember to call her — two text messages in 10 days do not a relationship make.

- Buy her stuff you like the look of. At this stage, she will be touched that you have made the effort — later on, you won’t dare choose so much as a hair slide without consulting her, or her best friend.

- Compliment her a lot, particularly if she has had a slightly dodgy haircut. And never make the mistake of stating a preference. That apparently innocent question, “Did you like it more when it was longer?” is a trap and will come back to haunt you.

- Go clothes shopping with her — it will make her feel sexy.

- Be polite to her parents, but hope they disapprove — when is she going to rebel a bit if not now?

- Be a flirt — it will drive her mad, but she’ll lose interest if nobody else likes you.

DON’T

- Be too available — she will think you are a loser. Instead, make sure you tell her you’re busy with self-improving projects such as writing a screenplay, as opposed to spending hours with your Xbox.

- Abandon your mates; she won’t respect you for it — never mind that if she was 20 years older, she would expect you to drop everyone you ever knew.

- Talk about the distant future. Women in their thirties and forties take it as a sign of maturity that you can discuss Easter in January, but twentysomethings find this claustrophobic.

- Be too possessive — it’s a definite turn-off. Women in their twenties expect to be able to flirt at parties and do exactly as they please without their boyfriend sulking. (By their forties, however, they are grateful for a bit of a reaction.)

IN HER THIRTIES

DO

- Get in the adventure holidays. In a few years’ time, all she’ll want is a sun lounger on a beach in Mauritius, but for now, she’ll admire your intrepid spirit.

- Buy her some jewellery — it can be silver.

- Always pick her up from the station/Tube. In her twenties, she wanted to prove her independence, but that’s no longer an issue. Ditto open doors, carry suitcases, and so on.

- Be silly and occasionally reckless — she wants security, but secretly fears the prospect of trouser presses and Sunday barbecues.

- Allow her a separate, secret office life, including parties.

DON’T

- Think it’s okay to hang out in large groups all the time.

- Be good friends with your ex — she may feel she has to indulge this or risk looking like a control freak, but you’re storing up trouble.

- Avoid conversations about marriage and babies. This is the decade when women are expected to tie the knot/get pregnant, so it’s important to be aware of this. A flirtatious “wait and see” is the attitude, not paralysis.

- Go clothes shopping with her — she’s become too good at it, and you’ll only get in the way.

- Believe her when she says she’s okay going home on her own. She isn’t.

- Play it cool — men who are too cool to dance start losing out now.

- Initiate reading in bed — if she picks up a book first, that’s okay — otherwise, you are insulting her in a way that you wouldn’t have been in her twenties.

- Be openly impressed by her closest female peers — she will take it as criticism.

- Notice someone else’s appearance and say, “Couldn’t you look like that?”

- Tease her about her cooking — it didn’t matter six years ago, but it does now.

| No Comments | No TrackBacks

Catch 22

 

It has been a full week since Airport Guy left so I have had a lot of time for reflection on how things went during the time that he was here. The jaded side of me thinks it was a complete disaster. Heck, if you stopped by my blog last Saturday night, you might even have read a post which I have since withdrawn saying that he wasn't the one.

However, the optimistic side in me thinks that things weren't so bad. We did manage to have quite a bit of fun together. Plus, what relationship is perfect right? I think a lot of it had to do with the fact that we are still getting to know each other and we didn't really discuss each other's expectations for the trip. Plus when you spend 24/7 together for days on end, one is bound to get a bit irritable, especially if one is visited by their monthly special friend.

So where do things stand now? Well, we are making plans to see each other in the summer, maybe even before then. Ultimately, any future together will require one of us to move and I don't think we know each other well enough to make that sort of decision. However, that's unlikely to happen if we keep living so far apart. So it's a real catch 22.

In the meantime, I need to work on developing my social network here in London as I still don't have any confidants. Yeah, I know quite a few people now and have a few friends but no one; I'd trust my life with. Sort of sad, but true. But I think I need to try a bit harder -- be a bit more trusting because I think the days of me relying on my best guy friend for advice need to be over. I mean, he lives over 4000 miles away and surely after all this time, I should be able to find someone closer to home.

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks

Sponsored Ads


Flickr

www.flickr.com

Books In My Library



Pages

About Ursula

About Choo Choo

ChooChoo-thumb.jpg

Full Name: Choo-Choo Barzey
Gender: Male
Breed: Domestic Long Hair Tabby
Color: Orange & White
Date of Birth: April 1996
Adopted: March 3rd, 2001

Archives

Blogs Worth Reading

{Updated in last 3 hours}

Webrings

Blog Stats

Kiva - loans that change lives

Listed on BlogShares

Terror Alert Level
Terror Alert Level
Statistics

FEED Validator

Credit

Designed by:
Code718

Hosted by
LivingDot

Powered by
Movable Type 4.23

Sponsored Ads